On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 06:53:14PM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote: > On Sat, Oct 28, 2006 at 04:47:38PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote: > > Why can't we have a compat_copy_siginfo_from_user() (and > > compat_copy_siginfo_to_user() for that matter) defined in > > kernel/compat.c for all architectures? The user32 convention really > > grates for some reason ;-) > > > > Coming in a later patch... This is just fixing one of the places where > compat signals changed generic code in signal.c
OK. It just doesn't make too much sense to me to add this copy_compat code to a half-dozen architectures, only to take it out again in a later patch. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
