On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 23:02:10 -0800 Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 30 Oct 2006 10:59:10 -0500 > Kyle McMartin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > [N.B. the modification to powerpc is probably wrong, since it seems > > to require a wrapper for handling the signed ints like sparc64 and s390 > > have. -- Kyle] > > Well that's a bit sad. Could the ppc guys please take a look?
It will be fine. Neither of the passed ints have valid negative values. The original comment was overly zealous. However it would be nice to not have "32" in the names of gerneic compat functions i.e. call it copy_compat_siginfo_from_user or get_compat_siginfo. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
pgpPif05CnPBV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
