From: Russell King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 20:15:12 +0100
> On Sun, Apr 01, 2007 at 06:01:23PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > ============== arm ================ > > CALL /home/sam/kernel/kbuild.git/scripts/checksyscalls.sh > > <stdin>:1092:2: warning: #warning syscall fadvise64 not implemented > > and probably never will be. > > > <stdin>:1220:2: warning: #warning syscall kexec_load not implemented > > For the ARM kexec-using folk to decide. > > > <stdin>:1260:2: warning: #warning syscall migrate_pages not implemented > > Does this make sense for ARM? I've no idea. You should hook both of these syscalls up even if the config option that enables them usually is not, or cannot currently be, enabled. The cond_syscall()'s will make sure they always link properly and provide a -ENOSYS implementation. Hooking them up makes it easier to check future missed cases without us having to add a plethora of ifdefs to the missing syscall checks for each platform. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
