From: Matthew Wilcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 14:09:47 -0600
> I haven't looked at the missing syscall check implementation, but it seems > like it's poorly designed if we have to add ifdefs for each arch. Why not > allow arches a mechanism to state which syscalls they intentionally > don't implement? The whole idea is for the arch's to just find out that a new syscall exists when someone adds a new one and some tries a build on that platform the next time. If the arch's still have to do work then the whole exercise is pointless. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arch" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
