Thomas Gleixner wrote:
So I deduce, that your HW has no way to mark the wakeup
interrupts. Whack your HW designer on my behalf, please! :)

Patch below against:

git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/linux-2.6-tip.git irq/core

It's 8 lines, but that's still at least an order of magnitude less
than solving this with an workaround. :)

Thanks,

        tglx

---------->
Subject: genirq-force-mask-on-suspend.patch
From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 21:22:14 +0100

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
---
 include/linux/irq.h |    2 ++
 kernel/irq/pm.c     |   14 ++++++++++----
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6-tip/include/linux/irq.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-tip.orig/include/linux/irq.h
+++ linux-2.6-tip/include/linux/irq.h
@@ -330,10 +330,12 @@ struct irq_chip {
  *
  * IRQCHIP_SET_TYPE_MASKED:    Mask before calling chip.irq_set_type()
  * IRQCHIP_EOI_IF_HANDLED:     Only issue irq_eoi() when irq was handled
+ * IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND:    Mask non wake irqs in the suspend path
  */
 enum {
        IRQCHIP_SET_TYPE_MASKED         = (1 <<  0),
        IRQCHIP_EOI_IF_HANDLED          = (1 <<  1),
+       IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND         = (2 <<  1),
 };
/* This include will go away once we isolated irq_desc usage to core code */
Index: linux-2.6-tip/kernel/irq/pm.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6-tip.orig/kernel/irq/pm.c
+++ linux-2.6-tip/kernel/irq/pm.c
@@ -68,10 +68,16 @@ int check_wakeup_irqs(void)
        struct irq_desc *desc;
        int irq;
- for_each_irq_desc(irq, desc)
-               if (irqd_is_wakeup_set(&desc->irq_data) &&
-                   (desc->istate & IRQS_PENDING))
-                       return -EBUSY;
+       for_each_irq_desc(irq, desc) {
+               if (irqd_is_wakeup_set(&desc->irq_data)) {
+                       if (desc->istate & IRQS_PENDING)
+                               return -EBUSY;
+                       continue;
+               }
+               if (desc->istate & IRQS_SUSPENDED &&
+                   irq_desc_get_chip(desc)->flags & IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND)
+                       mask_irq(desc);
+       }
return 0;
 }

Awesome. This addresses the suspend/resume concerns. Thanks so much.
Reviewed-by: Abhijeet Dharmapurikar <[email protected]>

To avoid compile time issues, I will add
.flags = IRQCHIP_MASK_ON_SUSPEND
in my driver at a later time (after this change is pulled in).

--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

Reply via email to