On 07/13/2015 05:46 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 05:34:57PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 07/13/2015 05:25 PM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
+
+static const struct of_device_id pm8xxx_pwr_key_id_table[] = {
+ { .compatible = "qcom,pm8058-pwrkey", .data = &pm8058_pwrkey_shutdown },
+ { .compatible = "qcom,pm8921-pwrkey", .data = &pm8921_pwrkey_shutdown },
+ { }
+};
+MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, pm8xxx_pwr_key_id_table);
+
Can we please keep IDs and device table where it was, close to the
driver definition?
That would require forward declaring the array here. Is that
desired? I moved it so that I could use it in the probe function.
Ah, yes, OF data is not passed into probe() :(... But we can always do:
match = of_match_device(pdev->dev.driver->of_match_table, &pdev->dev);
Maybe we could have a helper for this like:
const struct of_device_id *of_get_current_match(struct device *dev)
{
return dev->drv ?
of_match_device(dev->driver->of_match_table, dev) :
NULL;
}
Nice. I'll update and Cc the OF maintainers.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm" in
the body of a message to majord...@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
