>This doesnt help you in general. Having the ring buffer uncached on a lance >is the wrong solution (tm) for most platforms. Its better to flush the page >out of cache and push it to memory when writing. That gets you things like >burst writes. The idea for cached memory was for descriptor lists and things that you touch frequently but usually only a single word at a time. For those it seems better to have an uncached area than push it out of the cache all the time. Burst writes aren't a big deal if you're only transferring one word, and a single-word uncached read is actually faster than a cache line fill. For packet buffers and the like I agree with you. p. unsubscribe: body of `unsubscribe linux-arm' to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: StrongARM and AMD LANCE PCI NETCARD Russell King
- Re: StrongARM and AMD LANCE PCI NETCARD christophe leroy
- Re: StrongARM and AMD LANCE PCI NETCARD Russell King
- Re: StrongARM and AMD LANCE PCI NETCARD Philip Blundell
- Re: StrongARM and AMD LANCE PCI NETCARD Conor O'Gorman
- Re: StrongARM and AMD LANCE PCI NETCARD Philip Blundell
- Re: StrongARM and AMD LANCE PCI NETCARD Olof Backing
- Re: StrongARM and AMD LANCE PCI NETCARD Philip Blundell
- Re: StrongARM and AMD LANCE PCI NETCA... Alan Cox
- Re: StrongARM and AMD LANCE PCI N... Olof Backing
- Re: StrongARM and AMD LANCE PCI N... Philip Blundell
- Re: StrongARM and AMD LANCE ... Paul Koning
- Re: StrongARM and AMD LANCE ... Russell King
- Re: StrongARM and AMD LANCE PCI NETCARD Dr . David Alan Gilbert
