>This is the classic modutils-can't-handle-system-memory-over-32MB syndrome, >seen many times on RiscPCs. I don't think it's compiler related - it's >modutils-related. > >I thought that this was fixed ages ago (even before modutils 2.1.121 was >out). Yeah, I did too but maybe an old version escaped somehow. Get the latest from ftp://ftp.ocs.com.au/pub/modutils and see if it helps, I guess. p. unsubscribe: body of `unsubscribe linux-arm' to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Modules broken on 2.2.1[02] on SA-1100 ? J.D. Bakker
- Re: Modules broken on 2.2.1[02] on SA-1100 ? Philip Blundell
- Re: Modules broken on 2.2.1[02] on SA-1100 ? J.D. Bakker
- Re: Modules broken on 2.2.1[02] on SA-1100 ? J.D. Bakker
- Re: Modules broken on 2.2.1[02] on SA-1100 ? linux
- Re: Modules broken on 2.2.1[02] on SA-1100 ? J.D. Bakker
- Re: Modules broken on 2.2.1[02] on SA-110... linux
- Re: Modules broken on 2.2.1[02] on S... J.D. Bakker
- Re: Modules broken on 2.2.1[02] ... Philip Blundell
- Re: Modules broken on 2.2.1[02] on SA-1100 ? Philip Blundell
- Re: Modules broken on 2.2.1[02] on SA-110... J.D. Bakker
