On Thu, 27 Apr 2000, Zach Welch wrote: > The principal motivating factors here are: > > 1) We also use our bootloader for Windows CE; otherwise, this wouldn't be an > issue. > 2) The compression is "better" (_very_ fast decompression). Like I said, this has improoved a lot in latest kernels. I really mean a lot. Nicolas unsubscribe: body of `unsubscribe linux-arm' to [EMAIL PROTECTED] ++ Please use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for ++ ++ kernel-related discussions. ++
- Re: booting kernel on SA1110 Russell King - ARM Linux Admin
- Re: booting kernel on SA11... Steven J. Hill
- Re: booting kernel on SA1110 David Rusling
- Re: booting kernel on SA1110 Russell King - ARM Linux Admin
- RE: booting kernel on SA1110 Jeff Sutherland
- RE: booting kernel on SA1110 Chris Blazie
- RE: booting kernel on SA1110 Nicolas Pitre
- Re: booting kernel on SA1110 Zach Welch
- Re: booting kernel on SA11... Russell King - ARM Linux Admin
- Re: booting kernel on... Zach Welch
- Re: booting kerne... Nicolas Pitre
- Re: booting kerne... Russell King - ARM Linux Admin
- Re: booting kernel on... Nicolas Pitre
- Re: booting kernel on SA11... Nicolas Pitre
- Re: booting kernel on SA1110 Russell King - ARM Linux Admin
- Re: booting kernel on SA1110 Nicolas Pitre
- RE: booting kernel on SA1110 Jeff Sutherland
- RE: booting kernel on SA1110 Jeff Sutherland
- RE: booting kernel on SA1110 Nicolas Pitre
- RE: booting kernel on SA1110 Erik Mouw
- RE: booting kernel on SA1110 Jeff Sutherland
