Hello Hugues;

When a tool chain is built, it is unlike other binaries because the tool
chain is built for a specific path. The tool chain that I built must run
from the /skiff/local directory. No other path will work. It was built in
/skiff/local to accommodate Georgia Tech University.  If you go to
ftp.handhelds.org/pub/linux/arm/toolchain, then you will find a README file
with some install directions. Next week I plan to upgrade the toolchain with
a path of /usr/local and create a web page on http://handhelds.org with
instructions for building and installation.

I hope this helps. Please let me know how things turn out.

--George

George France,      [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cambridge Research Laboratory, Compaq Computer Corporation
One Cambridgecenter    MS: CRL
Cambridge, MA 02142 USA



-----Original Message-----
From: Hugues Belanger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, June 27, 2000 9:05 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Help with toolchain



I need a little help getting started with my little project...

I'm planning to port LRP (linux router project) to my LART board and I
can't get even compile a kernel...

I've downloaded Compaq's arm toolchain ... and extracted it to
/data/lart/cross/bin ... (I don't have to instruction on how to set it
up so I'm going with Lart's setup)

I've added that to the path in .bash_profile...

I've download kernel 2.2.16-1 and I could find any arm patch for this
kernel, so I'm assuming it doesn't need any for ARM...  Is that a bad
assumption ?

I applied all the LRP patches to the kernel tree...
and complied it for i486 (that worked great)...

I then changed the follwing in the top level Makefile:

ARCH := arm

CROSS_COMPILE  = /data/lart/cross/bin/arm-linux-

I get : Makefile:249: *** target file `symlinks' has both : and ::
entries.  Stop.

when I type make menuconfig

have you seen this before ?

Thanks

Hugues Belanger

unsubscribe: body of `unsubscribe linux-arm' to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
++        Please use [EMAIL PROTECTED] for           ++
++                        kernel-related discussions.                      ++

Reply via email to