Re: [linux-audio-dev] RFC: reply-to address default to LAD (was:Re: Reply-To)

[Paul Winkler]

James McCartney wrote:
> I also don't like to have replies to my emails come to me both from the
> sender and the list. I get two responses to everything. Why should I have to
> edit the headers when the default behaviour of every other mailing list
> makes this unecessary?

I agree, I think Reply-To: linux-audio-dev is helpful more often
than not. For instance, using Netscape mail, to reply to the list I
have to hit "Reply to All", delete 2 cc's and a To: who probably
don't need to read this message more than once, and then change CC:
linux-audio-dev to To: linux-audio-dev. Seems silly.

................    paul winkler    ..................
slinkP arts:   music, sound, illustration, design, etc.
A member of ARMS    ----->    http://www.reacharms.com
or http://www.mp3.com/arms or http://www.amp3.net/arms
personal page   ---->    http://www.ulster.net/~abigoo