On Thu, 4 May 2000, Richard W.E. Furse wrote:
> (1) Are the developers out there who fancy WRITING PLUGINS or processing
> algorithms (or just porting them) but don't want the hassle of writing and
> publishing an independent plugin library? If so, additions to CMT are easy
I'm way too busy myself at the moment, but a couple of ecasound users have
been interested in writing LADSPA plugins. I've started to promote LADSPA
as a C alternative to ecasound's native, heavily C++-based effect API.
For those of you who missed my Freshmeat announcement, ecasound's
stable-tree now supports LADSPA (1.7.7r11). Although not a very good
overall policy, I've included ladspa.h in the dist-package. Thanks to
this, users can start using LADSPA without too much hassle.
> more complex than a compressor in there. Perhaps I should set up a Source
> Forge account?
A *very* good idea! This would be a great way to get visibility.
> (2) I'd be interested to know which hosts are now supporting LADSPA and
> which hosts are planning to so that I can produce some 'road map'
> documentation for LADSPA.
Yep, we should have link pages for LADSPA hosts and plugins.
> ((3) LADSPA needs better user and development documentation.)
Well, as someone already said, this is important, but not critical.
--
Kai Vehmanen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ---------------- CS, University of Turku .
. audio software for linux .. http://www.eca.cx .
. armchair-tunes mp3/wav/ra . http://www.wakkanet.fi/sculpscape .
