>need to be damn sure you can win that case... In the future, when 
>contemplating patent infringement, it would be wise to not mention it to 
>anyone, or keep any evidence that you knew the patent existed. Fscking 
>lawyers. 

Yeah.. I guess that was a little "high and mighty" of me to pronounce
judgement on the patent.  I must have been reading too much Richard
Stallman stuff lately.  Probally regret that remark later on.

Anyway I am going to have a friend of mine who IS a patent lawyer read it
tell me what he thinks rather than just speculation.

If at all possible I would like to write things in such a way as to not
infringe on the patent however after reading the patent it seems to me
that anything remotely close to giga functionality will infringe 

--
Richard A. Smith    [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
"I'd hang out with science kids - they can blow things up!
 I mean , what's cooler than that?"
                                                   - Tori Amos


Reply via email to