I've had little feedback on the current form of the non-sequential
(non-causal) extensions to LADSPA. I'm wondering if this is because
(a) They're perfect ;-)
(b) People don't find them interesting/useful.
(c) I've made them incoherent and they aren't well understood.
(d) Everyone's too busy with the holiday season.
If the case is (b) or (c) there not much point in muddying the current API.
I'd be interested to hear what people think...
--Richard
-----Original Message-----
From: Richard W.E. Furse [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, December 10, 2000 2:32 PM
To: Linux Audio Developer Mailing List (E-mail)
Subject: Non-Sequential LADSPA Extension: experimental SDK
I've patched the LADSPA SDK with the proposed non-sequential additions and
updated listplugins, applyplugin and analyseplugin. These programs are now
something of a mess and in need of a rewrite, but appear to work (with the
constraint that applyplugin only allows non-sequential plugins for which
all inputs are non-sequential). I've also added the reverse plugin and
backed out the Default parameter :-(
If anyone is interested, there's a pre-release copy at
http://www.ladspa.org/download/ladspa_sdk_ns_pre.tgz.
--Richard
