On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 08:46:44PM -0000, Richard W.E. Furse wrote: > I'm reluctant to include the changes if they aren't likely to be used. I'm > thinking the best option might be to forget the changes for the moment. We > can dig them out again if they're useful in the future. ++votes. Don't loose the code though, I think its fine. Might scare people at this stage though. - Steve
- [linux-audio-dev] RE: Non-Sequential LADSPA Extension: ... Richard W.E. Furse
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] RE: Non-Sequential LADSPA Ex... Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] RE: Non-Sequential LADSPA Ex... Kai Vehmanen
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] RE: Non-Sequential LADSPA Ex... David Olofson
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] RE: Non-Sequential LADSPA Ex... Paul Barton-Davis
- RE: [linux-audio-dev] RE: Non-Sequential LADSPA Ex... Richard W.E. Furse
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] RE: Non-Sequential LADSP... Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] RE: Non-Sequential L... Jack O'Quin
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] RE: Non-Sequential LADSPA Ex... Paul Barton-Davis
- RE: [linux-audio-dev] RE: Non-Sequential LADSPA Ex... Richard W.E. Furse
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] RE: Non-Sequential LADSPA Ex... Paul Barton-Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] RE: Non-Sequential LADSP... Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] RE: Non-Sequential L... Paul Barton-Davis