You could well be right. I'm not happy about defining the port by its
label though: "Modulation depth (0=none, 1=AM, 2=RM)" doesn't seem like a
very nice id. Plus nothing guarantees that the label is unique (I think).
Maybe I sould use less verbose labels ;) but in the absense of a GUI
they add to usability.
- Steve
On Fri, Jan 12, 2001 at 10:36:29AM -0500, Richard C. Burnett wrote:
> Hmmm, what guarantees port order? I think that if the port were reordered
> there is more of a chance of mismatch then through port
> names. Additionally, if more things are added, the old settings would be
> retained regardless of order and just the newer values set to defaults.
> > I'd be a bit wary about using ladspa port names, then tend to be a bit
> > long, and subject to change (or maybe thats just me ;) They do have a
> > guaranteed order though, so you could get away with
> >
> > <plugin id="1234" label="plugin-a">
> > <port value="1"/>
> > <port value="1.1"/>
> > <port value="2.1"/>
> > </plugin>
