On Fri, 12 Jan 2001, Steve Harris wrote: > You could well be right. I'm not happy about defining the port by its > label though: "Modulation depth (0=none, 1=AM, 2=RM)" doesn't seem like a > very nice id. Plus nothing guarantees that the label is unique (I think). > > Maybe I sould use less verbose labels ;) but in the absense of a GUI > they add to usability. When a new version of a plugin is released, does it get a new id number or does it retain the previous id? Taybin
- [linux-audio-dev] ...saving plugin state Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ...saving plugin state Richard C. Burnett
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ...saving plugin state Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ...saving plugin sta... Taybin Rutkin
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ...saving plugin... Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ...saving plugin sta... Richard C. Burnett
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] ...saving plugin... Steve Harris