Bill Huey wrote: > > Andrew Morton's patch uses < 10 rescheduling points (maybe less from memory) err... It grew. More like 50 now reiserfs is in there. That's counting real instances - it's not counting ones which are expanded multiple times as "1". It could be brought down to 20-25 with good results. It seems to have a 1/x distribution - double the reschedule count, halve the latency. We're currently doing 300-400 usecs. I think a 1.5-millisecond @ 500MHz kernel would be a good, maintainable solution and a sensible compromise. -
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-lat... Joe deBlaquiere
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-lat... Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-lat... David Woodhouse
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-lat... george anzinger
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-lat... yodaiken
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-lat... David Woodhouse
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-lat... Roger Larsson
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-lat... Joe deBlaquiere
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-lat... David Woodhouse
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-lat... Bill Huey
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-lat... Andrew Morton
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-lat... yodaiken
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduli... Andrew Morton
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling p... Jay Ts
- video drivers hog pci bus ? [was:[linux-audio-... Jörn Nettingsmeier
- [linux-audio-dev] Re: low-latency scheduling patch for ... Andrew Morton
- [linux-audio-dev] Re: low-latency scheduling patch... Gregory Maxwell
- [linux-audio-dev] Re: low-latency scheduling p... Andrew Morton