[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > no, thats not the logical answer at all. the logical answer is > something like the excellent but neglected UTIME patch that > continually reprograms the system timer so that you can get precise > event scheduling without the insane overhead of HZ=10000. Indeed. Which, as an added bonus, lets me nick the system timer and reprogram it to 18KHz for the PC speaker driver :) But that's a different story. -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling ... Joe deBlaquiere
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling ... yodaiken
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling ... Joe deBlaquiere
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling ... yodaiken
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling ... Joe deBlaquiere
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling ... David Woodhouse
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling ... David Woodhouse
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling ... Pavel Machek
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling ... Joe deBlaquiere
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling ... Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling ... David Woodhouse
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling ... george anzinger
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling ... yodaiken
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling ... David Woodhouse
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling ... Roger Larsson
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling ... Joe deBlaquiere
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling ... David Woodhouse
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling ... Bill Huey
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling ... Andrew Morton
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling ... yodaiken
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] low-latency scheduling patch for 2.4... Andrew Morton