On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 10:54:55PM +0200, Abramo Bagnara wrote: > Steve Harris wrote: > > > > I've plotted process size against cpu use % for Abramo's test code, > > http:/plugin.org.uk/spmp/ > > > > This is on a 2 cpu PIII 866. > > > > Spoiler: Its all fairly linear until stack > 25k or shared > 140k, then it > > starts to go to pot. > > It's very interesting, but you don't plot the significative value i.e. > the difference between single process and multi process. Yeah, I was going to, but I couldn't remember how to fly gnuplot well enough, I'l have a go today. A 2d plot would be good too, but thats way beyond my gnuplot skills. > Also I think that the value to get from ctx is the lower from the 5 > generated (I don't know if you've used this). Yes, I used the average, wasn't thinking straight. > Sorry... I'm too esigent ;-) I don't think esigent is a word in english, what does it mean? - Steve
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
