On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 05:20:47PM +0200, Abramo Bagnara wrote: > > > > I'm a little puzzled. the "sp" case doesn't have any IPC costs or > > context switches. How can it be consuming 12-15% of the CPU time in > > these costs? These costs are always zero for this case, surely? > > As far as I understand Steve has not plotted the difference but the two > CPU usage %. The relative cost of mp approach is the difference between > the two values. Yes. When shared is 0, stack is constant, but not zero, and vica versa. So osme work is being done. I think a 2d graph of shared against stack against cpu use would be telling, but it would take a really long time. - Steve
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
