On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 09:43:56PM +0100, Steve Harris wrote:
> much. At 15k polluted data per cycle with 15meg of total data its still
> pretty reasonable.

Um, thats 1.5meg of course. Not so good, it heads for twice as expensive
as the sp option a taround 5meg, though without the sleeps in I think we
are unfairly favouring the sp case.

Also I don't think that I understood the code after looking at it again.
Probably best to ignore that one.

- Steve

Reply via email to