On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 09:43:56PM +0100, Steve Harris wrote: > much. At 15k polluted data per cycle with 15meg of total data its still > pretty reasonable. Um, thats 1.5meg of course. Not so good, it heads for twice as expensive as the sp option a taround 5meg, though without the sleeps in I think we are unfairly favouring the sp case. Also I don't think that I understood the code after looking at it again. Probably best to ignore that one. - Steve
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC J�rn Nettingsmeier
