On Tue, May 15, 2001 at 06:02:49PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > >Not loads, probably a meg or two, but half of it will get polluted on each > >invocation. > > You're going to touch 500kB plus to process 64 frames of audio data? That should have been in *some* invocations, it probably exaplains why you can't do low latency convolution on PC's. - Steve
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Performance and Elegan... Peter Hanappe
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Performance and Elegan... John Regehr
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Kai Vehmanen
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Anders Torger
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Alexander Ehlert
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Steve Harris
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Alexander Ehlert
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] Re: costs of IPC Jussi Laako
- [linux-audio-dev] Re: high level laaga Paul Davis
