>> You've just suggested the very concept I've been arguing for. In your >> first comment about it, it was done as a plugin. you've now suggested >> that it be available for two helper functions that form the core of >> the system. >> >> See my point? :) > >But I'm not excluding the possibility to have it *also* in a plugin (a >matrix routing soundbox). Why to impose limits to fantasy? ;-) I never suggested it couldn't also be a plugin. The question is whether it be can done without a plugin. If it is present in the core the system, then the usefulness of the plugin is a bit limited, but its obviously feasible. If its not present in the core, then the plugin is very useful, but less efficient. So, is it at the core of the system, or not? --p
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] matrix model vs. memory Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] matrix model vs. memory Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] matrix model vs. memory Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] matrix model vs. mem... Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] matrix model vs.... Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] matrix mode... Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] matrix ... Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] matrix ... Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] matrix ... Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] matrix ... Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] matrix ... Paul Davis
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] matrix ... Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] matrix model vs. memory Bill Evans
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] matrix model vs. memory Vincent Touquet
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] matrix model vs. memory Tom Pincince
- [linux-audio-dev] One API to rule them all... Jotsif
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] One API to rule them all... Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] matrix model vs. memory Abramo Bagnara
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] matrix model vs. memory J�rn Nettingsmeier
- Re: [linux-audio-dev] matrix model vs. mem... Abramo Bagnara
