Paul Davis wrote:
>
> >> You've just suggested the very concept I've been arguing for. In your
> >> first comment about it, it was done as a plugin. you've now suggested
> >> that it be available for two helper functions that form the core of
> >> the system.
> >>
> >> See my point? :)
> >
> >But I'm not excluding the possibility to have it *also* in a plugin (a
> >matrix routing soundbox). Why to impose limits to fantasy? ;-)
>
> I never suggested it couldn't also be a plugin. The question is
> whether it be can done without a plugin. If it is present in the core
> the system, then the usefulness of the plugin is a bit limited, but
> its obviously feasible. If its not present in the core, then the
> plugin is very useful, but less efficient.
>
> So, is it at the core of the system, or not?
Yes, it would be one *very* useful helper function for soundboxes
implementation.
--
Abramo Bagnara mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Opera Unica Phone: +39.546.656023
Via Emilia Interna, 140
48014 Castel Bolognese (RA) - Italy
ALSA project http://www.alsa-project.org
It sounds good!
