Stéphane Letz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Could JackEngine here be renamed "JackServer"? I think It would > correspond more to what "engine" and "server" are internally.
Now that we are on this, please tell me what "server" and "engine" are internally, from your point of view. I dont care that much about actual naming as long as it is commonly accepted. For example I can recall some ppl calling jackd process the "server". > Then why > not translate that in a pure C API, something like: I'll translate it once we agree on the API model (including naming). And I'll at least implement the API for the trunk jack codebase. -- Nedko Arnaudov <GnuPG KeyID: DE1716B0>
pgpjuOM3m8OuL.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
