Le 29 janv. 08 à 06:11, Nedko Arnaudov a écrit : > Stéphane Letz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Could JackEngine here be renamed "JackServer"? I think It would >> correspond more to what "engine" and "server" are internally. > > Now that we are on this, please tell me what "server" and "engine" are > internally, from your point of view. I dont care that much about > actual > naming as long as it is commonly accepted. For example I can recall > some > ppl calling jackd process the "server".
Speaking for jackdmp: - JackEngine keep the list of clients (internal in the server and "external/proxy" ones) - JackServer keeps a JackEngine object, the currently used audio driver, the "freewheel" driver... It is the "global" object in the server process, that allocates and keeps every more internal objects. > >> Then why >> not translate that in a pure C API, something like: > > I'll translate it once we agree on the API model (including naming). > And > I'll at least implement the API for the trunk jack codebase. > OK Stephane _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
