On Mon, 15.06.09 10:16, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano ([email protected]) wrote:
> > Distributions will certainly enable the D-Bus code in JACK if they > > ship it. So, I have no problem with depending on a dbus'ified jack for > > this logic to work. > > >From a packagers' (for Fedora/Planet CCRMA) point of view the future > dbus-capable jack should be able to be used without dbus support as well > as with it _without_ having to recompile it (that is without having to > repackage it differently). For an example of non-dbus usage, I may want > to start jack on a remote host where there is no desktop session at the > moment and thus dbus is not usable. No. That use case does not make any sense. The D-Bus session bus is autospawned if necessary these days. I personally see no value in dbus-less builds. That's just pointless conservatism, mostly based on unfounded anti D-Bus FUD. But then again, I am not really a jack developer, so what I think is mostly irrelevant. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4 _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
