On Mon, 15.06.09 11:38, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano (na...@ccrma.stanford.edu) wrote:
> > [it'd be nice if you keep all the cc'ed original lists in the thread] > > On Mon, 2009-06-15 at 19:34 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Mon, 15.06.09 10:16, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano (na...@ccrma.stanford.edu) > > wrote: > > > > > > Distributions will certainly enable the D-Bus code in JACK if they > > > > ship it. So, I have no problem with depending on a dbus'ified jack for > > > > this logic to work. > > > > > > >From a packagers' (for Fedora/Planet CCRMA) point of view the future > > > dbus-capable jack should be able to be used without dbus support as well > > > as with it _without_ having to recompile it (that is without having to > > > repackage it differently). For an example of non-dbus usage, I may want > > > to start jack on a remote host where there is no desktop session at the > > > moment and thus dbus is not usable. > > > > No. That use case does not make any sense. The D-Bus session bus is > > autospawned if necessary these days. > > So, let's say host A is where I am logged in now and I'm running a > desktop. The I start a terminal, just do "slogin B" (for simplicity > let's assume nobody is logged in into B at the time) and then I would > have dbus running there without a desktop? What is taking care of > setting up the dbus session, is that ssh? The login process? libdbus autospawns a session bus if none existant. It has been doing that since quite some time. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering Red Hat, Inc. lennart [at] poettering [dot] net http://0pointer.net/lennart/ GnuPG 0x1A015CC4 _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
