On Tuesday 04 August 2009 11:21:34 Chris Cannam wrote: > On Tue, Aug 4, 2009 at 9:43 AM, Frank Barknecht<[email protected]> wrote: > > Hallo, > > > > Arnold Krille hat gesagt: // Arnold Krille wrote: > >> Please be aware that (last time I checked) the gpl doesn't talk about > >> giving access to all gpl-code you use. Only if you change something you > >> have to make your changes available for free. > > Huh? I think, you're confusing something here. Is it too early in the > > morning? > Arnold's explanation is approximately true of the LGPL rather than the > GPL, so perhaps that's the confusion here. The LADSPA header is > indeed under the LGPL, but the plugins in question are generally under > the GPL -- so terms and conditions of our normal flamefests apply.
Ah, okay. Mixed these two up in my head. That the problem when your day-to-day-work uses LGPL for libs and GPL for apps... Good to have peer-reviewers that are checking for wrong facts written before the first coffee. :-) Arnold
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
