On Saturday 08 August 2009 15:44:41 drew Roberts wrote: > On Saturday 08 August 2009 14:25:37 Patrick Shirkey wrote: > > Sorry but how exactly is this different from a fork? Is there a guide > > that you have read somewhere that explains the exact steps required for > > making a fork? Why have you now decided that you are not actually > > forking the project when you originally declared that was the intended > > result of your efforts? > > Perhaps his stated intention was to fork but his point is that at this > point at least, no fork exists? Perhaps at this point, all that exists is > the original binary and a decompiled version of the source? (Along with new > text documents? Guessing here from the threads, not from checking either of > the projects.)
There is no decompiled source anywhere on the project. It is all code straight from the original Impro-Visor on SF. Raymond _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
