On Saturday 08 August 2009 15:59:56 you wrote: > On 08/09/2009 06:05 AM, Raymond Martin wrote: > > On Saturday 08 August 2009 15:44:41 drew Roberts wrote: > >> On Saturday 08 August 2009 14:25:37 Patrick Shirkey wrote: > >>> Sorry but how exactly is this different from a fork? Is there a guide > >>> that you have read somewhere that explains the exact steps required for > >>> making a fork? Why have you now decided that you are not actually > >>> forking the project when you originally declared that was the intended > >>> result of your efforts? > >> > >> Perhaps his stated intention was to fork but his point is that at this > >> point at least, no fork exists? Perhaps at this point, all that exists > >> is the original binary and a decompiled version of the source? (Along > >> with new text documents? Guessing here from the threads, not from > >> checking either of the projects.) > > > > There is no decompiled source anywhere on the project. It is all code > > straight from the original Impro-Visor on SF. > > Ok, Just to get this straight in my head. > > After you decompiled the code and threatened to put the results of your > labour online as a fork which encouraged Bob Keller to finally publish > the code in a public repo you have now taken that code and changed it > just a little bit, given it exactly the same name and are hosting it at > the same location as the official public release?
That is what is there for now. So lots of people have been complaining about nothing. Raymond _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
