On Thu, 2009-08-13 at 21:25 +0200, Julien Claassen wrote: > Hello Ken! > I can contribute little, but it may still push you in one direction. > I've seen both some QT-code and understood it and I've seen some gtk+, > which > I had more problems understanding. So I think QT might be easier to > implement. > Also QT has a lot by itself, nice helpers. > GTK now may be as easy to write, just me not understanding it, I'm not too > bright at it though. But GTK is good to use for blind people, because of the > Gnome people pushing some accessibiloity stuff. Also gtk and the glib have to > offer many things, which might come in handy. > One last remark and I drop off; GTK+ might not be that easy to read for > me, > because GTK is originally in C and gtk+ - as I understand - was kind of a > complex wrapper for it. > Kindest regards > Julien
Gtkmm is quite nice for the more C++ minded. Much nicer standard C++ style than the cracked out preprocessed pseudo-C++ insanity that is Qt, at any rate. The documentation is pretty crap in some places though. -dr _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
