On Thu, Aug 13, 2009 at 8:29 PM, David Robillard<[email protected]> wrote: > Gtkmm is quite nice for the more C++ minded. Much nicer standard C++ > style than the cracked out preprocessed pseudo-C++ insanity that is Qt, > at any rate.
As Pedro says, Qt just contains a code generator; you still end up with C++. I don't think the differences between Qt and libsigc++ signal/slot mechanisms are all that much to be worried about -- libsigc++ gets you "purer" C++ but Qt involves less typing, particularly of those pesky angle brackets. They both work. Good material for endless pub arguments, but not worth getting in a froth about when you're actually coding. (I generally use Qt, and I would say that Qt4 is a very fine library in general. Not much wrong with GTKmm either though.) Chris _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
