Fons Adriaensen wrote: > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 12:32:58AM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > > >> Fons Adriaensen wrote: >> >>> Or some _explicit_ feedback from somewhere downstream the patch >>> telling the voice allocator that a particular voice has decayed >>> far enough to be a candidate for re-use. My exploratory designs >>> for AMS II (gathering dust since four years) did exactly that. >>> >> This "was" a very good mechanism at the times when the first synth were >> able to play different sounds for different MIDI channels, but tone >> generators were to expensive, because of technical limits,... >> > > Note that the idea is *not* to have such feedback for the reasons > you mention. It is to make such things _explicit_ and user patchable > so a voice allocator can do more sophisticated things than most do > today. For example decide that a new note should not be a new voice > but a continuation of an existing one, depending on some configured > or even patchable conditions. > > Ciao,
E.g. as a function of legato or staccato played notes to restart or continue the envelope? _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
