On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 04:58:32PM +0200, Ralf Mardorf wrote: >>>> Or some _explicit_ feedback from somewhere downstream the patch >>>> telling the voice allocator that a particular voice has decayed >>>> far enough to be a candidate for re-use. My exploratory designs >>>> for AMS II (gathering dust since four years) did exactly that. >>>> >>> This "was" a very good mechanism at the times when the first synth were >>> able to play different sounds for different MIDI channels, but tone >>> generators were to expensive, because of technical limits,... >>> >> >> Note that the idea is *not* to have such feedback for the reasons >> you mention. It is to make such things _explicit_ and user patchable >> so a voice allocator can do more sophisticated things than most do >> today. For example decide that a new note should not be a new voice >> but a continuation of an existing one, depending on some configured >> or even patchable conditions. >> Ciao, > > E.g. as a function of legato or staccato played notes to restart or > continue the envelope?
For example, or to do something special when a note is repeated, depending on where in its envelope(s) the first one was when its note-off arrived, etc. -- FA Io lo dico sempre: l'Italia รจ troppo stretta e lunga. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
