On Sat, 19 Dec 2009, [email protected] wrote:
>> 1) The 'one app with plugins' group. People who are focusing on one big >> app, extended by plugins (Ardour, Qtractor, LV2/DSSI). This group >> doesn't have much interest in a session handler. > > And quite probably the authors of these apps are not very > motivated to make them compatible with session handlers. Over the past few months I've decided that I'm in group #1. Session management is good... but it requires /some/ level of consensus. I think LAD (at present) is too hostile to achieve this without some sort of "politician" showing up to unify the devs (and it ain't me, babe). That said, I'm open to adding session management to my applications and would love it if session management could succeed. > 4. And there's group 4, or maybe that group is just me. > If there are others I'd like to know. For group 4: When I'm not in group 1, I'm hanging out in group 4. Inter-host and headless session management is important to me, too. I really do hope that Fons releases his code. :-) -gabriel _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
