On Sun, Dec 20, 2009 at 4:33 AM, Louigi Verona <[email protected]> wrote: > Modular environment is great, but integrated environment seems to be more > effective.
statements like this are meaningless without clear qualifiers. feel free to say "for the kind of audio/music composition that I do, and the workflow that i use, i find an integrated environment more effective". please don't try to make blanket statements about the way that people use tools. > But I also have a suggestion. > Is it possible to create an integrated environment based on modules? That > is, an app which would have "plugins", but not plugins in a > sense like effects and synths only, but plugins as elements of the sequencer > itself, like piano roll, song editor, such stuff. A person opens this app > and starts adding elements he needs to it. For a particular project he might > not need a piano roll, he might need only audio track arranger, > for another projects he takes an audio track arranger and also adds a piano > roll. > Modules of such an app could be very different, like a loop player like > Kluppe, etc - all the apps linux audio has to this day but remade as modules > to an integrated sequencer. > > What do you think? i think you are new to linux audio. i also think that like most users of software, you don't actually know what you want or need - this is not a slam or a negative criticism, just a fact of life. it wouldn't be a problem if developers like me knew what you wanted or needed too, but alas, neither do we. --p _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
