On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Nedko Arnaudov <[email protected]> wrote: > Yes the goal is to have simple to implement state save "message" that > does not require additional libraries.
Well, I suppose as long as users are made aware that enabling it for applications they aren't absolutely sure support it is a dangerous thing to do. I don't like it, I think it's a simplification too far, but then I'm not one of the people using it. > Maybe you can watch the video, it is less than 5 minutes long. I did actually watch that, when it was announced. > Desktop session handler traditionally relies on X11. The trend in > freedesktop (KDE, GNOME) is to use D-Bus as IPC instead. I'm not aware > of D-Bus desktop session manager. GNOME is starting to use one. gnome-session switched to it in GNOME 2.24, completely breaking backward compatible session management during that release series for lots of users, including me. Badly done, but not intrinsically technically wrong. > In future, ladish aims to save/restore window > properties like window position, virtual desktop and screen > (multimonitor). That does sound like a desktop session manager to me. Chris _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
