On Fri, Jan 8, 2010 at 11:50 AM, Nedko Arnaudov <[email protected]> wrote: > Chris Cannam <[email protected]> writes: >> OK... That sounds rather hazardous to me. To lose all of one's data >> instead of saving it, after a potentially long session's work, because >> of a check box incorrectly checked when starting the application, >> surely wouldn't please many users? > > And you are suggesting what?
Uh, I think you've lost me a bit, Nedko. What do I appear to be suggesting? I'm just saying that it might not be such a good idea for a session manager to kill applications instead of saving them, when asked to save. Especially if that decision is based on user input that happened a long time ago (so that the user may have done a lot of work since making their mistake, but before discovering it was a mistake). Since none of my applications have any support for any sort of session manager yet, it's hardly surprising that I might be interested in thinking about how they might behave if someone tried to use them with one. Chris _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
