On Mon, April 12, 2010 09:26, Thorsten Wilms wrote: > polyphonic case, it should be c). Doubling a note seems perfectly > reasonable to me and accidental surplus Note-Ons are simply not > acceptable (I'm also not aware of that being a common problem).
Ok, ok, ok, my last question, this has got me all flummoxed but I now believe I've figured it out - please confirm! And as per hints regarding musical instruments which use the (non-digital) materials they're made of to produce sound... A string of note-ons following each other all for the same pitch n without any intervening note-offs for pitch n, IS PERFECTLY ACCEPTABLE provided they are INTENTIONAL and NOT accidental. I never said this would be unintentional nor a result of lousy programming ;-) Please say so, yes, that is correct, please.. James. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
