Am Freitag, den 16.04.2010, 18:52 +0200 schrieb Ralf Mardorf: > torbenh wrote: > >> Also note that there's no (easy) way back, we're entirely switching to > >> jackd2, that is, the user won't have the possibility to select jackd1 > >> instead. > >> > > > > great... many thanks. :((((((( > > > > For me this will be an advantage, because now I need to build several > dummy packages (or any other dirty solution) for jack, libjack, > development to avoid inconsistencies when I'm using JACK2 and by the > way, even if I would use JACK1, but instead of the distro's version the > current self compiled version, I need to do that, because auto-generated > by checkinstall there will be one package for jack, libjack and > development ;). > > IMO the user should have the choice between JACK1 and JACK2 and this > separated packages should become one package. JACK isn't an application > that's needed by the averaged Linux user, so it shouldn't be to much > work to keep a distro stable for both versions of JACK and in addition > there's no need to take care about rules that don't allow to have jack > and libjack in one package. > > 2 cents, > Ralf
I hope, when debian switch to jack2, they will make it in one packet (maximal a second for the dev files), that's what could make it easer to switch the version for people how like to switch. + 2 cents hermann _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
