hermann wrote: > Am Freitag, den 16.04.2010, 18:52 +0200 schrieb Ralf Mardorf: > >> torbenh wrote: >> >>>> Also note that there's no (easy) way back, we're entirely switching to >>>> jackd2, that is, the user won't have the possibility to select jackd1 >>>> instead. >>>> >>>> >>> great... many thanks. :((((((( >>> >>> >> For me this will be an advantage, because now I need to build several >> dummy packages (or any other dirty solution) for jack, libjack, >> development to avoid inconsistencies when I'm using JACK2 and by the >> way, even if I would use JACK1, but instead of the distro's version the >> current self compiled version, I need to do that, because auto-generated >> by checkinstall there will be one package for jack, libjack and >> development ;). >> >> IMO the user should have the choice between JACK1 and JACK2 and this >> separated packages should become one package. JACK isn't an application >> that's needed by the averaged Linux user, so it shouldn't be to much >> work to keep a distro stable for both versions of JACK and in addition >> there's no need to take care about rules that don't allow to have jack >> and libjack in one package. >> >> 2 cents, >> Ralf >> > > I hope, when debian switch to jack2, they will make it in one packet > (maximal a second for the dev files), that's what could make it easer to > switch the version for people how like to switch. > > + 2 cents > > hermann >
Full ACK, OTOH let's put our hands on our hearts ... Who is using Linux audio and doesn't compile one or two things depending to JACK ;)? I vote for one package for all! + 2 cents Ralf _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
