On Sun, Apr 18, 2010 at 4:21 PM, rosea.grammostola <[email protected]> wrote: > This could all be true, but that's not the point I was talking about. > JACK2 was planned as successor of JACK1. But at some point that changed,
No, Jack2 (then jackdmp) was not planned as a successor of Jack1. It was initially planned as an alternate implementation and a playground to try out some ideas, mostly because Stephane didn't feel that it was going to be easy to do that with the existing C codebase of Jack (and I think that everybody else agreed with him about that). *Later*, we agreed that Jack2 would become the successor of Jack1. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
