> i wrote tschack because i wanted to try out a different approach to the > functionality in jack2. and to understand how a parallel jack works. > now some people who had bad experience with jack2 tried it, and it works > for them. > so there is no reason to hide tschack.
On this specific point, what makes more sense : try to understand and fix the problems for "some people who had bad experience with jack2" ? or wait for a C++ rewritten jack1 ??? Stéphane _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
