On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Paul Davis <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 6:45 AM, Louigi Verona <[email protected]>wrote: > >> "you can swap qtractor for ardour, or anything else for that matter and >> the >> latency will be exactly the same systematic. a client can only process the >> results of its own outputs or sends in the _next_ process cycle." >> >> Ha! Rui, that makes sense. Now I think I get it. Indeed. >> >> I wonder if there is an easy way to compensate for this after the >> recording took place. > > > Ardour specifically has a "nudge by period size" (since that is the offset > that results) for precisely this purpose. > > --p > > This is exactly how I thought it can be done! Great Paul, really nice job you did! I think Rui is planning to implement something of that sort as well.
_______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
