On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 17:36:43 +0400, Louigi Verona wrote: > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Paul Davis wrote: > >> On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 6:45 AM, Louigi Verona wrote: >> >>> "you can swap qtractor for ardour, or anything else for that matter and >>> the latency will be exactly the same systematic. a client can only process >>> the results of its own outputs or sends in the _next_ process cycle." >>> >>> Ha! Rui, that makes sense. Now I think I get it. Indeed. >>> >>> I wonder if there is an easy way to compensate for this after the >>> recording took place. >> >> >> Ardour specifically has a "nudge by period size" (since that is the >> offset that results) for precisely this purpose. >> > > This is exactly how I thought it can be done! Great Paul, really nice job > you did! > > I think Rui is planning to implement something of that sort as well.
do i? :) anyway, while on the clip properties dialog you can always alter the clip start-time manually, in frames cheers -- rncbc aka Rui Nuno Capela [email protected] _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
