Excerpts from Geoff Beasley's message of 2010-06-06 00:36:15 +0200: > On 06/06/2010 08:33 AM, Geoff Beasley wrote: > > linuxaudio.org would indeed be a good place for such a tracker, and it > > is indeed a good idea but for the issue of 'updatedness' ie; it would > > need quite some effort to remain up-to-date and therefore relevant and > > useful.If it slipped behind it could in fact have the opposite > > effect. who would be prepared to undertake such a burden? it would > > need to be completely automated as the amount of info could be quite > > substantial quite quickly... seems to me the devil is in the detail. > > > perhaps a centralised,searchable database of existing bugtrackers may be > another option... > > g.
I think this would be relatively easy to do using the software that powers openhatch.org, but I don't think it would help with interoperability bugs. Some trackers are already huge on their own, some apps don't have trackers, so it would be huge but still inclomplete. -- Regards, Philipp -- "Wir stehen selbst enttäuscht und sehn betroffen / Den Vorhang zu und alle Fragen offen." Bertolt Brecht, Der gute Mensch von Sezuan _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list Linux-audio-dev@lists.linuxaudio.org http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
