On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 17:18 +0100, Ralf Mardorf wrote: > On Wed, 2010-12-15 at 16:41 +0100, Jörn Nettingsmeier wrote: > > On 12/15/2010 11:14 AM, gene heskett wrote: > > > > > Ralf I suspect, if he were to use pgp, would be like me, and only trust > > > pgp-2.6.2a, the last one before they put Zimmerman in jail for a few > > > years. > > > I have often said, and have been called the uber paranoid for it, that > > > one > > > of the conditions of his release was that the next generation of pgp had > > > a > > > back door. > > > > as they say, paranoia doesn't mean they're not after you! > > > > :-D > > > > i think this problem is mitigated somewhat by using open protocols with > > open crypto implementations that have undergone public scrutiny. unless > > you want to believe that "the NSA has quantum computers anyway and have > > solved the entire problem space years ago" :) > > PS: In the late 80ies German professional soldiers working as radio > operators, who spied Russians radio, learn that it should take around 20 > years to decrypted one mail. I know one and because it's a long time > ago, he's allowed to speak about this. Nobody is allowed to speak about > the current state, but it's still said, that it should take around 20 > years. Suspect! I guess in 2020 or 2030 they are allowed to give > information about the state of today.
1988 - 20 = 1968, so how could they make a projection? I guess everybody heard about 10 to 30 years to hack an encrypted email years ago. Knowledge about this must be a fake, they're liars. Paranoia isn't adequate, but über-scepticism is suitable. _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
