On Sun, Jul 03, 2011 at 08:10:09AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > the lack of quit-without-save is a decision that i was opposed to, but > accepted precisely because it has the potential to interfere with > developer's internal architecture. most applications these days ask if > you attempt to quit without saving (some will even treat the window > manager close button as a trigger for this). quit-without-save > (potentially) requires a new code path that circumvents whatever > internal logic the program has to decide whether to ask the user.
It requires nothing new, just calling the existing code that is linked to the 'Just Quit' button (using Ardour as an example). Ciao, -- FA _______________________________________________ Linux-audio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.linuxaudio.org/listinfo/linux-audio-dev
